Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | xwei's commentslogin

This article is just a trolling of China China China. Let me show you some useful info.

Bitcoin mining in China was legal. Because it can convert the waste electricity to money.

Now, the main reason for the ban is that China don't have enough electricity to manufacture due to the robust demand in export.

When China export drops or waste electricity increase, Bitcoin Mining will become legal again. This is where you can make money.


Oh c'mon. Bitcoin mining is defacto a waste of electricity which might have been used more productively elsewhere. Let's not live under rainbows and suggest that miners are using electricity somebody else threw away or were gonna "bury" or take offline.


How to start a legal world war against the biggest enemy (China)? 1) They were spying us. 2) They are killing our people. 3) They bombed our ship. For the justice and revenge!! easy job..


Academic software usually for publication. After paper accepted, unless they could publish another paper using same software/concept/idea, this software will dis-continued.


Facebook's competitors need to pay you more to refine your text.


Seems great, just the arrow buttons are so small (hard to click)


This is not about 'New' Syntax. Use eclipse or vim plugin to generate the template for you is better. So you never type ‘}’ again


That is researcher's job. Need at least thousands ppl's stats to get a small conclusion.


Researchers do studies that show e.g. that drinking coffee in the afternoon has a significant effect on sleep (let's say it results in an average of 15 minutes less sleep, p < 0.05).

This is valuable information, but people are different, so the question is, to what extent does this apply to me?

Genetics might help predict this (rs762551 ?), but in practice I'll just need to test this for myself.

The notion that there aren't always one-size-fits-all solutions is well accepted (though often still not well implemented) in medicine (a.k.a. personalized medicine).


"That is researcher's job" - Appeal to authority fallacy. We all can collect stats, run experiments, and draw conclusions. Some of us will have a better grounding in theory than others, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't experiment anyways. It's like saying "nobody but professional chefs should cook"

"Need at least thousands ppl's stats to get a small conclusion". - Not necessarily. It depends on the design of your experiment, the distribution of the data under question, and the desired margin of error. (Amongst other things)

But even if you only roughly estimate those things, you can gain conclusions that are valuable to yourself.

To make up an overly simplistic example: I spend two weeks not drinking coffee, two weeks drinking coffee in the morning, and two weeks drinking coffee in the evening. If the amount and quality of my sleep do not change significantly between the three experiments, it's safe enough to assume that I can consume coffee without influencing my sleep.

It's not a sound experiment, because it doesn't control for any number of variables. It has a wide margin of error. I have not really looked at the sample distribution of sleep duration/quality. And yet, I can make the assumption that drinking coffee in the evening will not affect my sleep.

The point is, it doesn't matter if it's 100% correct. It's roughly correct, most of the time - which is good enough to plan your life around.

It's of course not good enough to make any statements about the general impact of coffee on sleep patterns. But that's not what self-measurement tries to achieve.


Move from one evil to another. Wasting the time. This is real world please!


No. Real world is full of various DNA, and we can breed less evil by choosing.

Moving from one to another is never wasting the time.


I am reminded of this cartoon, http://pbfcomics.com/111/


Lookup, did they hide the "https://? And why NOT hide the "http://? Oh, I see, You are kidding right? :D


Sorry, you are right. Firefox does not hide https. My bad, but in my defence I've only used new Firefox occasionally.


They put half of my important mail into Spam. The shortcuts is used to mark all spam as important as fast as possible.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: