Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | eithed's commentslogin

As an outsider I have a question - do you actually feel that protest after ICE killing an american citizen would be driven by somebody paying for it, instead of being a civic movement?

do you actually feel that protest after ICE killing an american citizen is driven by somebody paying foe it?

In my opinion there is almost always money involved. People need incentives to put their lives and their families lives at risk when they would otherwise not be involved living multiple states away and would otherwise not be impacted such as by ICE in this case. There will be exceptions but I suspect those are a minority that may involve mental health, loneliness, attention seeking, virtue-signalling, roped in by emotion triggering videos, etc... I suspect one motivation would be to radicalize people when their paid rioters are told to do things that could risk an agent using bad judgement and someone gets hurt.


It could also be a "happy accident".

Statistically, if you put enough stupid people into enough spaces with hateful rhetoric being taught consistently, make them immune to consequences, and reward them when they do things that push towards the civil war you want to have, then eventually either you will completely oppress your country or you will have a civil war.


Statistically, if you put enough stupid people into enough spaces with hateful rhetoric being taught consistently, make them immune to consequences, and reward them when they do things that push towards the civil war you want to have, then eventually either you will completely oppress your country or you will have a civil war.

I could not have said it better myself. I still think it would not become a national level civil war but Minnesota could get messy. Plenty of other states would never let things escalate to this level. All of this could have been avoided by having local law enforcement or worst case the national guard get things under control. Minnesota have conflicting incentives delegate counts driving their bad judgement in addition to their governor being in the hot seat at the moment requiring a distraction.

Or from a movie some of us have seen, someone will do something stupid [1].

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnvTo8sLFJo


I think you've misunderstood the situation (and the article). Having the national guard get things under control means pitting them against ICE and likely actually triggering a civil war.

The problem is not Minnesotans or paid protestors rioting, the problem is a hostile occupying force is actively targeting Minnesotans and Walz is trying to balance protecting his constituents with not escalating the situation.

I'm not sure what you mean by "Minnesota have conflicting incentives delegate counts driving their bad judgement" or why you think its bad judgement to protest the murder of a community member.

But I dont disagree that as tensions ratchet up eventually someone will do something stupid, and ICE will threaten enough people that it sets off a conflict between ICE and the local law enforcement/national guard.


> A degree used to be a class distinction, a signal that someone belonged to the affluent in-group.

While I understand and agree to a certain degree, (and as a person with degree) it still fills me with dread where I work with senior developers who don't have a clue what is complexity of their algorithms or lack basic problem solving skills that a degree would instill in them. People can absolutely learn on the job but degree would still give me an idea of what I can expect from given person.

As a side note, LLMs are an equalizer that makes degrees less relevant when near keyboard; still, I want to talk to people that understand the concepts they're operating with when afk


A nice easter egg - click on a horse, when enclosed, on mobile

Invest in batteries

Edit: I mean focus solely on. It's a boring technology prone to disruption, used everywhere


Tesla has nothing obvious here to add to the marketplace --- most of their battery tech has typically been out sourced.

Lots of other companies with far more experience and expertice is battery research, development and manufacturing.


They're seem to be, with their factories and utility-scale systems: https://www.tesla.com/megapack


Preferably, solid state


In gemini:

> The reverse of the string 'gssssyeekxxuoaqaaaiooo9aaa7zjx' is:

xjz7aaa9oooiiaaaqauxxkyeessssg

> Youve made a mistake

``` I see where I tripped up! Let's re-examine that long string carefully.

The original string you gave me was: `gssssyeekxxuoaqaaaiooo9aaa7zjx`

Let's look at the end of that string: `...aaa7zjx`. When we reverse it, it should start with: `xjz7aaa...`

Here is the precise character-by-character reversal:

*xjz7aaa9oooiiaaaqauxxkyeessssg*

Wait—I see it now. In my previous response, I included an extra *'i'* and missed one *'o'* in the middle section. Let's do a strict count to get it perfect:

* *Original:* `g` `ssss` `y` `ee` `k` `xx` `u` `o` `a` `q` `aaa` *`iooo`* `9` `aaa` `7` `z` `j` `x` * *Correct Reverse:* `x` `j` `z` `7` `aaa` `9` *`oooi`* `aaa` `q` `a` `o` `u` `xx` `k` `ee` `y` `ssss` `g`

The correct reversed string is: *xjz7aaa9oooiiaaaqauoxxkyeessssg*

Thank you for catching that. It’s easy for the eyes to glaze over when there are so many repeating vowels!

Since I've stumbled a bit on these, would you like to give me one more string to see if I can get it right on the first try? ```

After more back and fors it consistently fails in this task, even though when strictly dividing the tokens it will get this right. Yet the final answer is always wrong.


Mine said it used python and got: xjz7aaa9oooiaaaqaouxxkeeyssssg


* stares at presidents / party leaders, religious leaders, social media influencers, tv stars, singers *

No, surely no


I guess who cares about civility if you're the last man standing.

Also - that word: civility. We're animals driven by self-interest. What should civility even mean here


> We're animals driven by self-interest. What should civility even mean here

That self-interest has led to cooperation between humans. Humans have evolved to work together, cooperate, form social bonds, and friendships because doing so improves survival and wellbeing over the long run. Civility is part of that toolkit. It is not a denial of self-interest. Civility is part of that self-interest.


Thank you, this is what I was trying to say… there are incentives to cooperate, even though individually we can be selfishly evil.


I don't understand how any of this is a surprise. Traditional media have their own agenda - sure, maybe the pushed image is spoken through many voices, rather than one, as is case of LLMs, but why should there be any difference. Same to everything we consume socially.

There is, nor there will be some absolute or objective truth an LLM can clinically outline. The problem already exists in underlying data.


I understand that SE needs to make money, but I find it fascinating how voluntary content (both questions, answers and moderation) is being monetised. Should I ask for percentage of ads income when my questions / answers are viewed?


There has to be some price tag associated with running Stack Overflow, but I wonder if it's within the range of something a collective could manage.

More and more I think we need volunteer projects running the things we depend on the most. Community driving email, forums, social networks and Q&A sites like Stack Overflow. A community driven Stack Overflow could still run a job board, or have the C# section be "Sponsored by Microsoft", or run a Jetbrains ad. If you only have to pay for hosting, then you need less ad revenue.


Stack Overflow famously ran on a half-rack of servers, duplicated in two locations for redundancy. This stopped when they got acquired by a cloud company - they were moved into the cloud. But it's clearly both possible and not too expensive.

I see prices around me for $500-ish/month for half-rack colo. Of course you have to bring your own servers if using this option.


> Volunteer admins with nothing better to do get their dopamine by closing questions for StackOverflow points, regardless of whether the supposedly duped question from 8 years ago is actually still the best answer and covers the nuances of the question now being asked.

This rung so true to me, given that my answer from 4y ago was closed as a duplicate of an answer made 3m ago :D (no, the nuances were not considered and the questions were ultimately too different; this didn't influence moderation decision at all and I was very confused on how I've made a duplicate 4y ago of a question in, at that time, the future)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: