Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If that were the best I could realistically do, yes (though that itself isn't realistic, there are many other criteria). Any other technique would, by definition end up unfavorably affecting a greater number of people.

Any imperfect criterion will always exist at the expense of some group of people (tautologically, the group of people to which the criterion is unfavorable). What difference does it make, ethically, if the group happens to be identifiable?



In the mandatory insurance example, its a zero sum game.

If an insurance company had no data, they would have to give everyone the average premium. Egality of ignorance.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: