Up until now, no one has pointed out the article eerily resembles the tones that began GamerGate.
The more you look at it, the more it appears to be a deliberate troll to highlight the irony of injecting identity politics into journalism.
He's a trojan horse. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_m...
Also, so called "anti-gamer gaters" don't simply go off and offer AMA's to "gamergaters".
Anti-GG's modus operandi is to cast aside any discussion as misogyny or harassment.
Both sides harass each other, unfortunately.
An AMA which he held deliberately vague and where he made various of the claims that critics of "GamerGate" make to begin with, for which he was amply downvoted at times: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_m...
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_m...
Again, what does this say about an ideology that sees someone writing for a giant publication as "tainted" simply for posting in a certain Subreddit, even if he largely agrees with them?
Up until now, no one has pointed out the article eerily resembles the tones that began GamerGate.
The more you look at it, the more it appears to be a deliberate troll to highlight the irony of injecting identity politics into journalism.
He's a trojan horse. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_m...
Also, so called "anti-gamer gaters" don't simply go off and offer AMA's to "gamergaters".
Anti-GG's modus operandi is to cast aside any discussion as misogyny or harassment.
Both sides harass each other, unfortunately.