You cannot call a reported news story an 'editorial' because the facts it chooses to present are somehow inconvenient to your agenda. Contra repeated claims that this piece was transformed by addition of "opinions", it seems to be composed entirely of verifiable facts.
I hardly ever use reddit, and I'll certainly agree that reddit (especially the default subs) is dominated by young males and can be, at times, misogynistic.
If I have an agenda here, it's to ask for better from professional journalists.
The NYT is entitled to their opinion, but I think it should be expressed in an editorial, not used to choose what facts to report.