Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't see how this is true. If you're building slack into your cycle there should be regular investment time available that a pure flow-based system wouldn't have.

If there's no slack in your sprint schedule, well there's your problem.



In my experience, Scrum's work-unit factorization encourages thinking of developers as spherical cows that need no personal development, with slack as a concession to reality that patches the damage Scrum itself causes. And Slack is generally considered to be for technical investment, though, not personal investment.

A good manager could think past that, for sure, but I've never encountered a good manager that felt Scrum was good or necessary for their teams.


"If you're building slack into your cycle"

Then management comes over and asks why you're slacking off.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: