Did you read the article? He explores (and technically explains) how higher samp... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Nursie on Dec 3, 2014 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: 24/192 music downloads are silly Did you read the article? He explores (and technically explains) how higher sampling rates can actually be much worse due to equipment.

elwell on Dec 3, 2014 [–]

I should add the combination:

If it is worse, then the person who thinks it is better benefits from it.

If it is worse, then the person who thinks it is worse loses value with it.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact