Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is a silly question but as someone who lives in a place that will never experience an earthquake can someone explain to me why they are so dangerous? I get that things can fall over/collapse but in areas such as CA aren't buildings structured to survive an earthquake? Don't you secure large objects (cabinets etc.) to the walls?


You can go 10+ years without a big earth quake in CA, so people get lazy, stop strapping their hot water tanks to walls, stop nailing bookshelves against walls, etc...

Also - not all buildings are earthquake proof - only modern ones. Older ones can still fall down fairly easily.

Finally - when push comes to shove (pun intended), a 6.0+ is just going to do a lot of damage regardless of your precautions - particularly around store shelves, roads, etc...


The other thing I think people don't often understand (or appreciate, or respect) is that the richter scale is logarithmic.

A 7.0 isn't just a little bit worse than a 6.0. It's 10 times worse. And an 8.0 is 100 times more powerful than a 6.0.

So we're not too terribly concerned with these smaller quakes, even if 6.0 is still pretty big. The one we worry about is hundreds of times more powerful. There are some levels of energy you simply can't prepare for.

Don't mean to fear-monger, but that is the truth.


Just to put the 6.0 in context, from the NYT today: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/25/us/strong-earthquake-shake...

"The temblor struck about six miles south of Napa around 3:20 a.m., according to the United States Geological Survey. It was the most powerful earthquake to hit the Bay Area since the Loma Prieta earthquake of 1989, which collapsed a section of the Bay Bridge. The shaking was felt over an area that encompassed hundreds of miles.

The earthquake threw much of the Napa Valley — normally an edenic retreat famed for its wine and fine dining — into chaos of falling glass and collapsing bricks. Dozens of water and gas mains were ruptured, and at least six fires broke out, including one in a mobile home park that destroyed four homes and damaged two others. Thousands remained without power."

Now, can you imagine what a 10x more powerful earthquake at 7.0 would do? (Roads, Bridges, and Buildings collapsed).

An 8.0 would be so catastrophic that deaths would be in the hundreds, and damage would be horrific.


It's not just the buildings themselves but the ground they're built on. Many areas in the Bay Area are built on land fill (like areas of SF) or bay bottom soils. When a big earthquake hits, this kind of soil liquifies, amplifying the motions caused by the quake, destroying anything build on top of it if not anchored into bedrock.


A Magnitude 6 earthquake hit during golden week this year in downtown Tokyo, last I checked there was a couple of injuries but that's it.

Granted a lot of infrastructure is equipped for this (gas was shut off in my apartment for example), but it's possible to be prepared for this.


I totally agree it's possible to be prepared, but if you're talking about the earthquake I'm thinking about from May - http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/global/shake... - I don't think it's a great example, since the epicenter was pretty far from central Tokyo and also quite deep (153km) so at the surface it wasn't particularly strong.

Apart from being centered very close to Napa this earthquake was also fairly shallow (10km) so it was significantly more intense (albeit in a small, not heavily populated area) even though it was of the same magnitude. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/nc/shake/722...

(I say that based on the numbers, not having first-hand experience with either quake)


I'm not arguing that you can't prepare for this - but a 6.0+ is just going to do a lot of damage, regardless of how much you prepare. Roads will be torn apart, older buildings will shatter, fires will be started, etc...

Preliminary reports put the damage to in California in the neighborhood of $1 Billion.

It's important to repeat that this was the biggest earthquake the Bay Area (an area that certainly gets its share of earthquakes) has seen in 25 years.


It helped that my TV included a little kit (containing cords, brackets, and screws) and instructions for securing it. It felt like just another step in the physical setup of the TV, not something I had to do "eventually."


Good points, thanks.


In this case, a picture is worth a 1000 words:

http://imgur.com/Sunh0Iy

That was from Napa this morning. Imagine if someone were standing under that? Now multiply by tens of thousands of homes and businesses.

The buildings themselves are designed to survive, but many are old and not up to code, because you only have to make a building earthquake safe when you sell it or renovate it.

Also, many people do not secure large objects to the wall. And sometimes it is the small objects that are the problem. Wine bottles, mirrors, anything that can shatter and fling glass everywhere.


Just wondering, what is this place?


Ireland.


this can be interesting: http://earthquaketrack.com/p/ireland/recent

I myself leaved in place, where I thought never can have earthquake, but at some point was woke up but 1.5 magnitude. I think almost every place on Earth can have earthquake at some point.


You would be the first person in the history of mankind to wake up to a 1.5 magnitude earthquake :)

I believe up to 2.0 they are not felt by humans, only recorded by seismographs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale


Thanks, didn't know ) Don't remember magnitude exactly, long time ago. Just was trying to say that it was low


I should clarify. Every few years there are reports of an earthquake somewhere in Ireland but it's always such a minor quake (usually less than 2.0) that nobody notices.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: