Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
damncabbage
on May 29, 2014
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Git 2.0
I can almost understand with something like Subversion (which seems to subtly skew the entire development process to work around the friction some of its basic operations introduce), but not even Mercurial? :(
joeblau
on May 29, 2014
[–]
Not even Mercurial :) Haha j/k I actually don't mind Mercurial, but I'd still rather work with git.
crdoconnor
on May 29, 2014
|
parent
[–]
They're essentially identical. Mercurial just has slightly easier to understand syntax and and a cultural bias against rebasing.
anton_gogolev
on May 29, 2014
|
root
|
parent
[–]
Nope. Mercurial devs rebase heavily during Mercurial development, for instance. It's Changeset Evolution [1] that makes history rewriting _safe_.
[1]:
http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ChangesetEvolution
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
