Yes, it's clear that it hasn't been the case in the past. That's why it's news that it's starting to happen now.
The more it happens, the more powerful it will become. Imagine Google appointed James Clapper to their board. Don't you think there would be a response?
>Yes, it's clear that it hasn't been the case in the past. That's why it's news that it's starting to happen now.
It would only be news if was consistent and applied to everyone. Microsoft, Apple, Google, Yahoo, etc all supported Obama, and the things he's done with the NSA are at least as bad as what Rice did. Dropbox and Rice are getting fallout because of some bizarre hatred for the Bush administration and not some newfound resolve to be ethical at all times. Yes Google would have fallout for appointing Clapper. They wouldn't have any from Hilary Clinton or Joe Biden or Obama himself, which would be the real equivalents to Dropbox appointing Rice. FWIW, Google also can't appoint Keith Alexander.
So until they day we can universally hold all politicians to account, we should hold none of them to account?
I agree with you that all of these people should have their political records examined when they join corporations. Supporting this action is a starting point to have this become a more widely used tool.
I'm not saying you shouldn't, I'm just suggesting it's not news. I think this is coming from a bizarre hatred of the Bush administration in particular, and not some newfound resolve to hold individuals accountable to ethical actions. If it is simply a new action that coincidentally is starting with Condi, then great. I don't believe that to be true.
Thanks for clarifying your view. I don't see any evidence of this given that the criticism against Dr. Rice are clearly laid out, and many people have explained why they are relevant to Dropbox.
The more it happens, the more powerful it will become. Imagine Google appointed James Clapper to their board. Don't you think there would be a response?