Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The conflation of file type and editor is orthogonal to the use of file extensions as type metadata. I agree that including the file's type in the name is suboptimal, but in a world where we're constantly sending files from one environment to a completely different one, it isn't entirely unreasonable either, as file names are the one truly universal way of identifying a file, and a file's type is part of its identity.


Oh, it's necessary in the world we live in, no argument there -- but it's stupid. It's more janitorial nonsense from the bad old days.


I assume that none of your files have extensions then?


When somebody says something is "necessary," you assume they don't do it? That hardly seems rational.


Some do, as a concession to lousy software.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: