Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't understand the point of having a bunch of little exchanges running on the same backend. Why not just have one?


Agreed... an exchange is more useful the more volume it has.


Although this might not be the right way to do it, I think the goal of the project is to exemplify bitcoin's "distributedness" and minimize the reliance on a single exchange (ie MtGox).


Several exchanges running on the same backend aren't that distributed; there are many scenarios where they would all go down at the same time.


I think the problem isn't distributivity but decentralisation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: