Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem is that you can spend years or decades working on something that the market deems irrelevant. Case in point: GNU Hurd.


The question I have presented here does not imply an old traditional development model where you keep working on something for years and then release it to the public. You can use agile or whatever model deem appropriate to you. The question is about What would you FOCUS on for 5 years even if you don't see a light of success and keep working on it.


Isn't the problem with Hurd the fact that they did spend years working on it, instead of just releasing something early and iterating?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: