You say that as if any Tea Party candidate has actually espoused anything that truly constitutes limited government. _delirium more or less summed it up. Why don't you actually read his Wikipedia page to see what I'm talking about instead of repeating really boring quips.
You'll note my comment implies that I like actual libertarianism and just not the crap that the Tea Partiers go around calling libertarianism.
>Why don't you read more than just his Wikipedia page?
Because reading it is enough to know that he doesn't fit the bill of a libertarian?
>Do you really like actual libertarianism?
Yes?
>judging people in categorized groups instead of as individuals isn't very libertarian of you.
Haha, what is your point? Make one instead of just trying to find something to argue about. Find me a Tea Party candidate that fits the actual definition of a libertarian and then we can talk.
You'll note my comment implies that I like actual libertarianism and just not the crap that the Tea Partiers go around calling libertarianism.