Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Except this is settled case law. LinkedIn tried and lost against scrapers.


That was a case of scraping explicitly public data that was already available to the general public without any extra effort.


Which is exactly what Twitter is?


no twitter requires a login


Which anyone can make


I think that this is different because Nitter uses real X accounts for scraping, rather than publicly available data.


That is still a form of publicly available.


Explain to me why that matters at all in an ethical sense. Especially given the scraping / pirating that's gone on by all of these companies in the last number of years.


Who cares this is a subthread about legal advice.


When have ethics ever mattered in law?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: