It is what it means in English.
>Bad ideas don't need scalable code and scalable performant code is not as fast to write as quick and dirty code.
Scalable and performant are two entirely orthogonal concepts. Neither of which are really relevant to the topic, correctness.
Oh, you want to be a jerk; OK, discussion over, grow up.
> Scalable and performant are two entirely orthogonal concepts.
Obviously, that's why they were mentioned separately. Get a clue.
> Neither of which are really relevant to the topic, correctness.
Well aren't you full of yourself, bugger off now.
It is what it means in English.
>Bad ideas don't need scalable code and scalable performant code is not as fast to write as quick and dirty code.
Scalable and performant are two entirely orthogonal concepts. Neither of which are really relevant to the topic, correctness.