Many DSM-5 diagnosis come into effect with the ICD-11, ICD-10 doesn't have a good deal of them, and that rollout is still fresh & ongoing.

It is kinda spooky, though, to have freshly minted doctors from a few years back whose school-knowledge will forever be "outdated and archaic" based on standards published before they were in school.

Some good advice I got: treat this as a generation shift, find younger and newer doctors who are familiar with the "modern" standards.

APA guidelines come with expiration dates [1]. 10 years is the maximum.

Churn is built in to the specialty. Read into that what you will.

[1]: https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/criteria?item=5

Oh I agree with you, it's just that I don't think LLMs are either. If you think of LLM knowledge, especially in scientific/engineering fields, as a lossy representation of the density of ideas, then you'd expect to see some weird behavior. I'm sure there is some sort of a temporal discounting and people thinking about this, but a naive NLL or Reverse-KL on medical literature would engrain some weird, wrong ideas.

I brought down prod system because I was too stupid and relied down on LLM advice, even double checking it.

I would not trust my health to LLMs, that is true.

Why would you expect a Polish psychiatrist to understand the differences between different versions of a diagnostic manual used only in the US?

Because when I got ADHD diagnosis in Poland, one of the criteria for diagnosis was according to DSM-V :P