Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
rafram
3 months ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
DaVinci Resolve 21
Pretty sure that does not cover a face database indexing your own photos/videos, running locally on your own computer. If it did, that would be extremely silly.
anon7000
3 months ago
|
next
[–]
Yeah, that’s been a thing in photo software for at least like 20 years. I remember using it as a teenager for my parents
throwaway240403
3 months ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
I think you're right in this case, but Illinois lawmakers are generally extremely silly, so I wouldn't put it past them.
rightbyte
3 months ago
|
prev
[–]
Why would the law make exemptions for running the search on on a computer that has the database.
rafram
3 months ago
|
parent
[–]
Because outlawing the local facial recognition that software like Lightroom and Apple Photos has offered for decades would be extraordinarily silly?
rightbyte
3 months ago
|
root
|
parent
[–]
Sure. I guess the intent is the main difference.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: