Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For the animations specifically, it's using Motion (fka Framer Motion) Javascript library. If you describe some animations from the site to an LLM and ask it to use Framer motion, you get very similar results. The creator likely just prompted for a while until they were happy with the outcome.


Is there a reason to think it was done by an LLM?


AI-generated UIs, at least ones aimed at an engineering audience, have a very distinct appearance. They seem to always have the following attributes:

- Dark mode design with lots of colors

- Buttons that have vibrant, bright borders and duller backgrounds

- Excessive (IMO) usage of monospace fonts for stylistic reasons

None of this proves that it's AI (the other comments have covered that) but in my experience it's always correct.


It states "curation assisted by AI" at the bottom.


That doesn't mean the code in question was written by AI.


The author posted in this thread. It's AI.


You’re missing the point. It’s not a witch hunt, but rather a discussion on whether things are too quickly attributed to be AI generated.


That's one way to look at it but I don't think it was that deep.


The biggest reason would be: do you know a single developer who could have produced this in a couple of hours?


Yup, strange to see people still don’t understand LLMs massively speed up coding greenfield pet projects. Anytime you see a bee web app it’s better to assume AI use rather than not anymore.


I'm not familiar enough with this animation library to answer that. Someone could be very used to this type of website and just copy paste things they've done before.


What does Occam's razor say?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: