Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That is all email addresses, it’s part of the spec. Aside from broken implementations of course.

Periods are optional.

Edit: Woops yeah, meant pluses. Dots are somewhat common as optional these days but not universal.

 help



False, this is only with Gmail. And not even true for Gmail workspaces.

Which "spec"? Many specifications exist and not every MTA, mailbox, nor email client understands the latest and every implementation is guaranteed to have quirks, but here are the most common: RFCs 822, 2822, 4952, 5336, 6530. There is no the spec. Subaddressing isn't standardized, but there was a half-hearted RFC on that with too many extra features. How email user parts are interpreted is up to the MTA, mailbox, or email client. Plus subaddressing informally as a hack has existed since at least 2005 according to my rusty memory. It's, therefore, a de facto standard. Use it where possible to track down leaks of personal information, but it's likely to bite with some gotchas. I used to maintain a @{{name}}.name domain and email server where all emails went to a single catchall account without setup or subaddressing needed to disambiguate which source email correspondence was from.

> Dots are somewhat common as optional these days but not universal.

This handwaving tautology is meaningless.


He's talking about aliases, not independent email addresses.

Are you sure you mean dots and not pluses?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: