> We require a method of filtering such that a given researcher doesn't have to personally vet in excruciating detail every paper he comes across because there simply isn't enough time in the day for that.
We do require such a method. Isn't that what AI is for? Strictly working as a filter. You still need to personally vet in excruciating detail every paper you rely on for your work.
Maybe. I think that's still experimental and far too resource intensive to do on an individual basis. However an intensive LLM review performed by a centralized service once per paper as a sort of independent literature watchdog would likely be of value. I haven't heard of such a thing yet though.
We do require such a method. Isn't that what AI is for? Strictly working as a filter. You still need to personally vet in excruciating detail every paper you rely on for your work.