Uhh… The fact that there's no Archlinux package for a given language doesn't imp... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		codethief 13 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Tree-sitter vs. Language Servers Uhh… The fact that there's no Archlinux package for a given language doesn't imply there's no tree-sitter support (official or 3rd-party) for that language? See e.g. the very long list of languages on https://github.com/Goldziher/tree-sitter-language-pack , which does include R, YAML, Golang, and many more.

tetris11 13 days ago [–]

it does suggest lack of mature support though, and it breaks your configs if you want to rely on system libraries

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact