Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As an interviewer, I ask the same problems because it makes it much easier to compare candidates.




How do you know if one candidate happened to see the problem on leetcode and memorized the solution versus one who struggled but figured it out slower?

It's very easy to tell, but it doesn't make much difference. The best candidates have seen the problems before and don't even try to hide it, they just propose their solution right away.

I try give positive feedback for candidates who didn't know the problem but could make good use of hints, or had the right approach. But unfortunately, it's difficult to pass a Leetcode interview if you haven't seen a similar problem to what is asked before. Most candidates I interview nowadays seem to know all questions.

That's what the company has decided so we have to go along. The positive side is that if you do your part, you have good chances of being hired, even if you disagree with the process.


It doesn’t matter. It’s about looking for candidates who have put in the time for your stupid hazing ritual. It signals on people who are willing to dedicate a lot of time to meaningless endeavors for the sake of employment.

This type of individual is more likely to follow orders and work hard - and most importantly - be like the other employees you hired.


Once upon a time, the "stupid hazing ritual" made sense.

Now it means company is stupid.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: