Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It virtue-signals that they're part of the hip functional crowd.

(To be fair, if you are programming functionally, it is essential. But to flat-out state that a language that doesn't support isn't "serious" is a bit rude, at best.)



Supporting recursion only to a depth of 1000 (or whatever) is equivalent to supporting loops of up to 1000 iterations.

If I put out a language that crashed after 1000 iterations of a loop, I'd welcome the rudeness.


Plenty of languages, including very serious ones like C and Rust, have bounded recursion depth.


Then let me rephrase:

If every iteration of a while-loop cost you a whole stack frame, then I'd be very rude about that language.

This works, btw:

  #include <stdio.h>

  long calc_sum(int n, long acc) {
    return n == 0
      ? acc
      : calc_sum(n-1, acc+n);
  }

  int main(void) {
    int iters = 2000000;
    printf("Sum 1...%d = %ld\n", iters, calc_sum(iters, 0));
    return 0;
  }


> If every iteration of a while-loop cost you a whole stack frame, then I'd be very rude about that language.

Well, sure, but real programmers know how to do while loops without invoking a function call.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: