No it’s pointing out that your argument sounds like it’s intentionally missing critical information in a way that makes your audience think or feel a certain way.
Yes, and you literally just said nothing. Re-examine your comment and tell me you actually provided a substantive response. You can't. You say I'm missing critical information but make no mention of your fairy tale critical information. You make reference to "my audience". What audience? Are you making universal assumptions about my beliefs based on a very limited subset of my opinions?
I will speculate that you view yourself as a reasonably intelligent person; yet you're here, essentially arguing that a biological male can identify as a biological female--all while ignoring science; basic human biology: XX, XY.
But most people like you will turn around and say something along the lines of, "Well, that's sex, not gender." So gender is a social construct, and those that fabricated that construct are now going to force society to participate in their fabrication?
Get a grip, man! You're not convincing anyone of your non-sense. But keep coping; that's all you can do: cope.
