Part of the issue is that I think you are underestimating the number of people n...

friendzis · 2025-12-11T07:54:00 1765439640

Wrong. 80% of code not being advanced is quite strictly not the same as 80% people not doing advanced programming.

NewsaHackO · 2025-12-11T15:03:27 1765465407

I completely understand the difference, and I am standing by my statement that 80-90% of programmers are not doing advanced programming at all.

whoknowsidont · 2025-12-10T20:56:28 1765400188

Why do you feel like I'm underestimating the # of people not doing advanced programming?

NewsaHackO · 2025-12-10T21:07:47 1765400867

Theoretically, if AI can do 80-90% of programming jobs (the ones not in the "advanced" group), that would be an unequivocal +1 for AI.

whoknowsidont · 2025-12-10T22:27:00 1765405620

I think you're crossing some threads here.

NewsaHackO · 2025-12-10T22:33:33 1765406013

"It's not. And if your team is doing this you're not "advanced." Lots of people are outing themselves these days about the complexity of their jobs, or lack thereof.

Which is great! But it's not a +1 for AI, it's a -1 for them.

" Is you, right?

whoknowsidont · 2025-12-10T22:54:09 1765407249

Yes. You can see my name on the post.

NewsaHackO · 2025-12-10T23:14:48 1765408488

OK, just making sure. Have a blessed day :)