Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That’s fair, but to me the “in Rust” part is the most relevant. I wanted to see how ergonomic it was to do such raw memory tweaking in the memory-safe systems programming language.




But they do pepper `unsafe` everywhere.

As you can see they're creating safe wrappers around the raw unsafe windows API which uphold the invariants. Microsoft should provide these as a crate.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: