"racism and hate" is double speak for opinion the left doesn't like/allow. quite funny how transparent it has become even for hn.

Could you provide a specific example of an opinion labeled as "racist and hateful" that you believe was misclassified as such?

pointing out patterns in scientific statistics / the real world, not agreeing to label something as something which it scientifically isn't and not changing the meaning of well established words for ideological reasons.

Those aren't very specific, so it's hard to understand the dichotomy you're trying to paint.