Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Katz jut said "what a person knowingly exposes to the public" IIRC. We'd need a new SCOTUS case to clarify whether data derived from physical features that can be used to identify you still counts as such


Agreed.

> what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.

Identity might be, might not be.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: