Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What does a pro-consumer Chrome actually look like? There are, AFAIK, 4 business models for browsers:

1. You pay for it in cash

2. It's "free" but you pay for it with your data which is harvested and used to target ads at you

3. The weird Brave crypto model which basically does what 2 does, but you get some token for it

4. The Firefox sell your search traffic to Google model

Number 1 gets completely blown out by 2 when they compete in the market to the point it doesn't exist anymore, so that's not really viable. 3 seems scammy and nobody really wants it anyway. 4 is what I use, but let's face it, it's just 2 light with better ad blocking. It's also probably on its last legs since the courts have ruled that Google can't buy default search (which ironically will probably enhance its monopoly position).



> It's also probably on its last legs since the courts have ruled that Google can't buy default search (which ironically will probably enhance its monopoly position).

"Under the court's ruling, Google will still be permitted to pay for search placement --- those multi-billion-dollar arrangements with Apple and Mozilla can continue."

- https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/09/google-wont-have-to-...


I am proposing a new model, yes. I’d like to see a pro American billionaire doing what’s good for the people instead of what’s maximally profitable. They could leverage profit in other areas to finance an unprofitable (but morally correct) business.

Long term a regime change is needed because you will lose to immoral competitors, but it’s the only fight worth fighting.

I also realize Sam Altman is a sociopath who would never do this.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: