Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's what I thought: is an extension really that restrictive to where you need your own fork of a browser engine?

It appears to me like they're posturing to investors on the AI hype train. Publishing an extension isn't as sexy or "grand" as shipping a browser.



For-profit customizations (via an extension) may want to fork to avoid competitive situations such as e.g. the multi-year struggle between uBlock Origin extension and Google:

- https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/About-Google-Chrome's...

Not for-profit may fare better, tolerating and pivoting as corporate owners attempt to strategically vendor-lock-in new markets, presented to e.g. Google by the innovators of the extension.


Putting your brand name on the primary application users interact with on a computer is probably a few billion times more valuable than an extension in a thing under someone else's brand.


Yeah, but it's the same reason why Cursor forked VS-Code instead of being an extension


Controlling the full browser gives you a lot more freedom for any future additions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: