> after Ruby Central was threatened to have their funding revoked from Shopify
So you take the original allegations at face value, even though they only rely on second hand reporting of anonymous testimonies, yet you don't want to consider my post even though the standard of proof is the same.
You didn't include the actual context of the sentence you quoted, which is that I'm summarizing my understanding of the allegations. Do you not agree with me that those are what the allegations are, or do you think my ability to summarize them somehow implies that I must agree with them?
The problem with your post is that you're asking people to believe something without telling them what it is. I'd be more than willing to consider an alternate explanation of what happened but so far no one has been willing to share one. Regardless of your reasoning for withholding it (and the reasons of the others who apparently have knowledge of it), no one is going to be convinced of anything of anything by just asking people to trust blindly. At the end of the day, people are not going to believe there's some secret truth that explains everything about how Ruby Central and Shopify were acting if l in good faith; they'll need to be told what actually happened, or they'll quite understandably trust the people who don't seem to be trying to hide something.
So you take the original allegations at face value, even though they only rely on second hand reporting of anonymous testimonies, yet you don't want to consider my post even though the standard of proof is the same.
Got it.