Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Gotta polish that fig-leaf to hide Apple's real stance towards user privacy: arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/12/apple-admits-to-secretly-giving-governments-push-notification-data/

> Apple has since confirmed in a statement provided to Ars that the US federal government "prohibited" the company "from sharing any information,"



I mean if you throw out all contrary examples, I suppose you are left with the simple lack of nuance you want to believe


All examples contrary to what? Admitting to being muzzled by feds?

Take all the space you need to lay out your contrary case. Did the San Bernadino shooter predict this?


You literally said that we should disregard this example and focus on the “real” situation as evidenced by a different example.

It is exactly the same thing as saying “if you ignore the heads, these coins really always come up tails”.

Does the Chewbacca argument method ever work these days?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: