Yeah, but you don’t actually want intelligence — you want consistency. And LLMs are great at giving you the next word or phrase based on the probability that you truly believe a prompt and its context.

Which is exactly what you want. It’s like if you ask a group of five people what they want to eat, knowing they’re all vegans. If you wanted a fair decision-maker, you’d hope they pick something close — vegan and good. An AI will always give that answer in a boring and predictable way. But a human might take outside context into account or selfishly pick a non-vegan restaurant — not because it’s consistent, but due to any number of random outside factors.

An LLM might very well pick undesirable outcomes because all it's doing is remixing human knowledge which has led to plenty of undesirable outcomes.

LLM powered governance seems like a janky version of luxury communism.

But, people, I guaranteed fairness and wisdom. Just trust my model, OK? It's for your own good.

I give you my word.

Issue is "might" is better than the guaranteed corruption of socialist system at scale. You can adjust the AI, humans we know are to flawed to lead a altruistic movement or make constant selfless decisions

Debatable. E.g. "MechaHitler."