Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Nearly 50 year old technology is generally inferior to modern equivalents, that hardly an argument that Starship’s R&D process is going well.


Again, feel free to point to any rocket of the size and reusability of Starship which is further along in development or has developed faster. None exist.


> Nearly 50 year old technology is generally inferior to modern equivalents <

Feel free to counter the points being addressed rather than attack a straw man. Obviously if Starship was strictly worse there’d be no point in trying to develop it.

Suggesting a modern preproduction car is better than a Fiat Argenta from the early 80’s isn’t a recommendation, same deal with Starship.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: