Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, because the CAA record only has to be in place at the time of issuance, rather than the whole lifetime of the certificate.

Even if the semantics of CAA were changed, the challenges described in paragraph 3 of this post would apply: https://www.imperialviolet.org/2015/01/17/notdane.html



> No, because the CAA record only has to be in place at the time of issuance, rather than the whole lifetime of the certificate.

could we change this? Ie. if the CAA record disappears, it would be a reason to revoke a certificate?

Then 3rd parties could scan transparency logs and CAA records and flag discrepancies.


It would be possible to change, though that would be a pretty big change.

Personally I think this is another good argument for short lived certificates and reducing reliance on revocation systems.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: