Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't believe it's being done so strategically. He's not Franklin D Roosevelt.

I forget all the details, but some constituency once came to FDR to ask him to do something. He likely leaked that he was planning on doing so to major Catholic organizations in America, and when there was outrage, turned to the first party and told them that he'd love to, but his hands were tied. He never intended to do anything in the first place, he just wanted a convenient scapegoat.

This doesn't make any sense. Why not just go with 10% tariffs across the board? There wasn't going to be any pushback, it should be clear at this point. Or why not just leak the plan, and then say "I guess it has to be 10% because business leaders won't accept higher."

This isn't masterful juggling, it's improv comedy.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: