> Nice try. We are not at war with these countries and not even close to it either. Trump is the most non-interventionist president of the last few decades. This is an empirical and historical fact.
Trump has only been in office for two months. He's clearly threatening to take intervention to never before seen levels.
> Obama in Executive Order 13576 ...
Obama's executive order and actions were within the rule of law, "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America". Very many of Trump's are not; Trump openly challenges and disregards any limit from law or the courts.
> [DEI/ESG:] Yes which is great - this is an example of reducing the size and scope of government.
It doesn't matter if you think it's great. It's stopping private organizations from doing what they choose - that is government using its power to compel behavior.
> There is a literally an EO on preventing online censorship
Human rights - freedom - is universal or it's nothing. It's just Trump protecting his friends and persecuting his enemies - the opposite of freedom.
They are arresting people in the street and deporting them for speech, forcing schools to censor students and faculty, forcing leaders of business and journalism to avoid criticism and even to support him - as just one example, look at the law firms he is extorting for representing parties critical of him.
It's also oppressive to force private companies - social media companies - to adopt policies Trump prefers, including about moderation.
Trump has only been in office for two months. He's clearly threatening to take intervention to never before seen levels.
> Obama in Executive Order 13576 ...
Obama's executive order and actions were within the rule of law, "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America". Very many of Trump's are not; Trump openly challenges and disregards any limit from law or the courts.
> [DEI/ESG:] Yes which is great - this is an example of reducing the size and scope of government.
It doesn't matter if you think it's great. It's stopping private organizations from doing what they choose - that is government using its power to compel behavior.
> There is a literally an EO on preventing online censorship
Human rights - freedom - is universal or it's nothing. It's just Trump protecting his friends and persecuting his enemies - the opposite of freedom.
They are arresting people in the street and deporting them for speech, forcing schools to censor students and faculty, forcing leaders of business and journalism to avoid criticism and even to support him - as just one example, look at the law firms he is extorting for representing parties critical of him.
It's also oppressive to force private companies - social media companies - to adopt policies Trump prefers, including about moderation.