Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> they refused to let me cancel my contract early without me showing them my new lease

They problem is the cancellation process, not "they shouldn't charge me if I'm not using it".



Yes, but that problem would've been moot if they were prohibited from charging me for months I didn't use it (i.e. every month after the one wherein I attempted to cancel).


> that problem would've been moot if they were prohibited from charging me for months I didn't use it

No, the problem would be moot if the cancellation process was as easy as the sign up process. And I think the US finally got that law


Even if I'd simply "forgotten" to cancel, the prohibition on charging me for the months I didn't use it would've made this a non-issue. Hell, I'd probably still be a customer today, now that I've long ago moved back to a city with Anytime Fitness locations.


> Even if I'd simply "forgotten" to cancel,

But you didn't. You clearly stated that the burden of cancelling was too high: " The gym staff admitted to remembering that I attempted to cancel because I was moving to a place with no Anytime Fitness locations; they refused to let me cancel my contract early without me showing them my new lease, which I didn't have yet"

This is the root of the problem. Not the "prohibition to charge for services you've subscribed to but don't use".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: