Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

furthermore, he is blaming the company's decision on his COO and not on himself as CEO. more than almost any other founder, he maintained control over his company and for better or worse it is clear that he alone bears the responsibility for what the company does as a result of that control. blaming one of his most trusted, respected, and successful deputies for what he now describes as a failure does not reflect well on him as a leader in my esteem.


I think he did her dirty. Don't think he is where he is today without her being by his side back then. She was and remains a fantastic operator.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: