Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

IME this is much more prevalent in organizations that hire "nontechnical managers". I personally will never work in such companies again, the experience of having your boss have literally no clue what it is you do for a job is not one I'll sign up for again.


IME the differentiator is not a technical background; it's whether they care more about ladder climbing/appeasing their own managers or doing something useful.


This is a more accurate assessment.

A quick filter of effective management is asking the question: What do you hope to gain out of this job?

If the answer is a promo or ladder-climbing, you know that they will make sub optimal decisions that guide their ladder-climbing journey.


I regularly ask the question "how do know I'm doing good" in exactly those words. You'd be surprised at how easy it is to identify their management style from the answer to that question.


Can you elaborate?


I think the problem is a bit harder than that. I've seen a lot of managers who were once technical, but whose last hands-on experience was years, or decades ago. They have a vague idea of what they need to know/do but lack the skills to find things out themselves. and they turn into a major drag on productivity.


I should have been more specific--what I mean by nontechnical managers is managers who don't commit code regularly.


Disagree - I've seen this all over. The problem has absolutely nothing to do with tech whatsoever, and everything to do with decision making.


You also get developers made manager that are terrible at management and trust so lean on micromanaging.

There's a happy medium somewhere.


aka the entire c suite




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: