If that's the patent in question, it's so specific as to be useless.
The first claim, which all other claims depend on, only claims the invention when
1) The voting patterns are being displayed in a "swarm interface"
2) The "thickness of a line" is used for visualizing the number of votes
I don't believe that any of the modern sites use a swarm interface at all, and if someone wanted to show a swarm interface, by using something other than the thickness of a line for the visualization, you've sidestepped the patent.
It's hard to believe someone paid good money for this.
The first claim, which all other claims depend on, only claims the invention when 1) The voting patterns are being displayed in a "swarm interface" 2) The "thickness of a line" is used for visualizing the number of votes
I don't believe that any of the modern sites use a swarm interface at all, and if someone wanted to show a swarm interface, by using something other than the thickness of a line for the visualization, you've sidestepped the patent.
It's hard to believe someone paid good money for this.