Isn't that illegal? If it isn't, it may become so in the near future as many legislations are working on it.
Satire is protected in the US and many other countries, but "cloning" a person using AI implies that it makes difficult to distinguish between the real person and the clone. I guess it can pass if it is obvious that it is indeed satire, but that would be risky.
Maybe it could be remediated by having him wear a clown hat or something.
I love the idea that the character and likeness would be Infowars' IP and went with the sale. That claim he made during the custody proceedings, about playing a character, should definitely come back to bite him in the ass.
Satire is protected in the US and many other countries, but "cloning" a person using AI implies that it makes difficult to distinguish between the real person and the clone. I guess it can pass if it is obvious that it is indeed satire, but that would be risky.
Maybe it could be remediated by having him wear a clown hat or something.