> Can you explain whether you think it is an appropriate suggestion and why?
Yes, I can explain, no, I don't think it's an appropriate suggestion, principally because here in this context it's trite, beige, and unworthy of mention.
> Meconium is a word of utmost feculence!
* You're likely to be human, that seems to be an unGPT response.
* Smell aside I doubt baby poo peaks the utmost feculence scale, with the majority of babies for the most part it's going to be low in pathogens - there are nastier biologicals out there in the world at large.
Then surely op’s, as you ascribed, “bootstrapping network of self referential agents” could easily “improve itself” and by “expanding its own capabilities” demonstrate such, as you defined, “trite, beige, and unworthy of mention” suggestions.
i hope this is a meta joke, but given the....oddly provocative?.... line of semantically-insatiable pedant-ism influx, I fear there are now swarms of agents doing the "socializing"/bidding of unknown entities - including themselves.
whether to RAG specialized knowledge from bell-curve dwellers or to solicit medical information that is then easily correlatable with other info from an audience with a high median income, whos to say.
Some might see 'your' response as nothing more than some kind of dead stochastic parrot autoGPT generated text.
The meconium nature of your newly birthed account doesn't add gravitas here.