Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My understanding is Chinese ports have a much higher level of automation than ours. Whether or not that translates into overall higher efficiency I do not know.


So you go from:

> allow automation because we (the rest of the country) need efficient, competitive ports to play in the world economy

to:

> Chinese ports have a much higher level of automation than ours. Whether or not that translates into overall higher efficiency I do not know.

How are you able to make the former argument if you don't actually know it'll help at all?


They want a total ban on automation of gates, trucks, and cranes. [1]

Gates? Come on, do we really need to pay somebody $150k+ to open/close a gate?

The same article implies the west coast ports apparently also have more automation than the east coast ports. And depending on who you believe (the union or a CA professor), the automation didn't hurt man/hours at the ports.

1- https://apnews.com/article/longshoremen-strike-pay-automatio...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: