Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sounds like a solid plan. No reason to incur switching costs if things are working!

I think you're misunderstanding what "removing pandas" means.

You can still compute on DataFrames, it'll just be with something other than Pandas itself, probably DuckDB, Polars, or DataFusion.

So, the bridge was there, is there, and isn't going anywhere.



> I think you're misunderstanding what "removing pandas" means.

Maybe it’s in the messaging, like the “Farewell Pandas” part?


Feel free to put up a pull request with an alternate title that you feel communicates the message in a more accurate way!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: