Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

if you have a year of 99.97 months, don't you have a 99.97 year? how does having a shorter time make the numbers look better?

[edit: i realise they could be hiding worse months, but i don't think that's what the post i am replying to meant. perhaps i am reading it wrong.]



They could have done it to the extreme -- show the numbers for the past hour. Then they could almost always report 100% uptime. And if they ever went down, wait an hour, then go back to reporting 100% uptime again.


They could have terrible uptime 2 months ago and you wouldn't see it in their status page, because it only showed last month's.


Parent post was saying that, without taking into account the entire year, you can have one month that is terrible and the rest quite good.

The measurement in question is supposed to be about consistency.


Depends on the month...

31 versus 28 days.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: