> The US vastly benefit from Chinese immigration and most Chinese aren’t spies. However, it’s interesting to notice the damage one person can have, arming our most potent adversary with advanced technology.
How would you quantify all this? I mean I think we're all on the same page about not wanting to reduce people to their race. That's a good sentiment. But do you have data on any of these claims? When you observe that Chinese nationals are uniquely positioned to arm "our most potent adversary with advanced technology", I dont think you can just handwave such damages away.
> No we aren't. China, at any rate, isn't squeamish about using nationality and race of a person as one of the inputs into profiling them.
This is a fair point, but misses my point. I meant the vast majority of people on this board aren't just racists who dislike certain races. So we don't have to divert all conversation to trying to prove it.
I don't understand your point here, are you arguing that you want USA to mirror China as a society and government? You do know that living in China isn't great?
> are you arguing that you want USA to mirror China as a society and government?
It's truly confusing to me that you go to that conclusion out of what I wrote.
I was simply pointing out that, no, we are not all on the same page, and those not on our page are simply going to be better at preventing industrial espionage.
How would you quantify all this? I mean I think we're all on the same page about not wanting to reduce people to their race. That's a good sentiment. But do you have data on any of these claims? When you observe that Chinese nationals are uniquely positioned to arm "our most potent adversary with advanced technology", I dont think you can just handwave such damages away.