Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Somehow I doubt that the EU competition authority will appreciate Apple’s logic that criticizing their implementation of pro-competition regulation is valid grounds for preventing a competitor from accessing said implementation.

It’s like if your parents forced you to give a slice of your birthday cake to your little brother, and in spite you intentionally cut him a slice with no frosting. When he complains, you go: “No cake for you then!”



> In the past, Epic has entered into agreements with Apple and then broken them

That sounds like a legitimate reason to not do business with Epic to me?


Epic’s past behavior didn’t occur in the EU and was aimed at getting Apple to make the kind of concessions that the EU is now forcing upon them.

Epic seems to have followed the letter of the DMA by setting up a European subsidiary that deals with Apple’s European subsidiary. My feeling is that the antitrust people at the European Commission won’t be happy with Apple’s refusal to give them access.


but epic was spitting on the cake. neither party is holy here




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: