If there's one thing C++ needs, it's more slightly-different varieties of smart pointers in the standard. ;-)
What exactly would you use these for? I find that usually I can get away with unique_ptr for the sort of object that I have many of where pointer performance matters.
Some sort of problems where you throw trees around. Almost interpreter like programs, where trees are arbitrarily stored on different places. And where you for some reason don't want a proper GC ...
What exactly would you use these for? I find that usually I can get away with unique_ptr for the sort of object that I have many of where pointer performance matters.